The Android image is Google certified but uses by default Microsoft Launcher as the shell something free for all Android devices. Waze supported the OS until Google bought them then it was abandoned. The Duo is the first Android phone from Microsoft built using hardware they originally planned to load Windows Mobile 10 on until they gave up due to developers not defecting back from Android or IOS and that what they got was shovelware that impersonated real apps and dummy apps put in to hold copyright in the store. It's a surface device it automatically blows anything Apple makes out of the water. What if Canonical put some weight behind a new mobile OS? They've failed a couple time already, I'm sure they want some of that market too. Heck come out with a decent spec device, install an AOSP build and set the launcher to their existing launcher and you'd be halfway there. What if Microsoft actually made a run at it? I know they have their hooks into Android anyway, but they've got the know-how and the resources and obviously would like a share of the mobile market. It just takes money and a strong enough opinion that Google is doing bad things to get a start. Google-approved devices won't matter in that scenario, and it shouldn't. Right now Amazon is the only one that has really made any significant strides, but as Google continues their shady ways, I bet that changes, especially if they get a knock from a major court somewhere (EU I'm sure is watching them pretty hard right now, privacy is a huge topic right now). There have been a few people (Amazon, Blackphone, Cyanogen could even fall into this group) that have created their own OS's based on Android source, complete with additional features that are supposed to replace Googles. I think it's a very valid point, but I think the only resource that is limited here is money.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |